Meta-analysis of laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
- Author:
- No author available
- Journal Title:
- National Medical Journal of China
- Issue:
- 16
- DOI:
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.16.005
- Key Word:
- 胃肿瘤;胃切除术;腹腔镜;Meta分析;Stomach neoplasms;Gastrectomy;Laparoscopes;Meta-analysis
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the safety and cfficacy of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer through a meta-analysis of LADG versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG).Methods Comparative studies of LADG and ODG wer collected from Pubmed,Cochrane library,Web of Science and Biosis Previews Databases between January 1995 and October 2012.The data of operative duration,blood loss volume,number of harvested lymph node,proximal and distal resection margins,time to flatus,time to first oral intake,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative morbidity and 5-year survival rate were analyzed.And statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1 software.Results A total of 16 articles were analyzed.There were 4 randomized controlled trials and 12 retrospective observational reports.Among a total of 2854 patients with gastric cancer,1441 LADG and 1413 ODG subjects wereincluded.Compared with ODG,LADG resulted in significantly prolonged operative duration (weighted mean difference (WMD) =49.09 min,P ＜ 0.01),less blood loss volume (WMD =-118.99 ml,P ＜ 0.01),less time to flatus (WMD =-0.58 d,P ＜ 0.01) and oral intake (WMD =-0.61 d,P ＜ 0.01),shortened postoperative hospital stay (WMD =-2.48 d,P ＜ 0.01) and less postoperative morbidity (relative risk (RR) =0.62,P ＜ 0.01).Distal resection margin did not differ significantly between LADG and ODG (WMD =-0.01 cm,P =0.94) while proximal resection margin was significantly shorter in the LADG group (WMD =-0.83 cm,P ＜ 0.01).The number of harvested lymph node was significantly lesser in the LADG group than that in ODG group (WMD =-2.17,P =0.05).However,no significant difference existed when only analyzing the papers published over the last 5 years or having over 50 LADG cases (all P ＞ 0.05).Furthermore,the 5-year survival rate did not differ significantly between two groups (RR =1.02,P =0.52).Conclusion As a safe and practical procedure with less blood loss volume,fewer overall complications and a quicker recovery,LADG may offer satisfactory long-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional open surgery.
- [1]DU Xiao-hui,LI Rong,Chen Lin,etc.Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: initial experience[J].2009,(12).
- [2]Kim DH,Baik YH,Bae JM,etc.Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.[J].2008,248(5).
- [3]Yang K,Lu QC,Wang L,etc.Short-term evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for predictive early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.[J].2009,19(4).
- [4]Hyun-Tae, Chun,Ki-Han, Kim,Min-Chan, Kim,etc.Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open subtotal gastrectomy for pT2 gastric cancer.[J].2012,53.
- [5]S, Kitano,Y, Iso,M, Moriyama,etc.Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.[J].1994,4(2).
- [6]Han HS,Lee JH,Yom CK.Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.[J].2009,23(8).
- [7]Wei HB,Huang Y,Huang JL,etc.Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.[J].2010,27(4).
- [8]Kim HH,Jung GJ,Kim MC,etc.Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.[J].2005,91(1).
- [9]Ryu,S.-W.,Han,S.-U.,Ryu,S.Y.,etc.Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A large-scale multicenter retrospective study[J].2012,26(6).
- [10]Kim HH,Hyung WJ,Cho G.Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial).[J].2010,251(3).
- [11]Oshima T,Izumisawa Y,Kosaka T,etc.Effect of obesity on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.[J].2010,102(2).
- [12]Kondo Y,Okada K,Masuko H,etc.Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer targeting as a less invasive procedure.[J].2008,22(1).
- [13]Yoo CH,Hwang SI,Kim HO.Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.[J].2009,23(6).
- [14]Tamamori Y,Ohtani H,Azuma T,etc.A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.[J].2010,14(6).
- [15]Shimada H,Ochiai T,Gunji Y,etc.Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.[J].2005,19(9).
- [16]Fujii Kyuzo,Shiraishi Norio,Yasuda Kazuhiro,etc.A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.[J].2002,131(1 Suppl.).
- [17]Hao Y,Luo H,Zhang Y,etc.Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer.[J].2011,25(9).
- [18]Asao T,Mochiki E,Kamiyama Y,etc.Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Five years' experience.[J].2005,137(3).