Abstract： Objective To discuss the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in women with different indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis(amniocentesis and eordocentesis), and the procedure-related complications. Metheds A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1264 women, who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis (1082 amniocentesis and 182 eordocentesis), and the procedure-related complications were reviewed. Results The indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis in these 1264 women were: increased risk at prenatal screening (651, 51.5%), advanced maternal age (≥35) (318, 25.2%), abnormal foundings through uhrasonograph (136, 10.8%),history of adverse pregnancy (88, 6.9%), one or two abnormal serologic markers (52,4.1%), and chromosomal balance translocation carrier in either one of the couple(19, 1.5%). Thirty-seven cases were found to be chromosomal abnormalities with clinic significance and the indications for them were: ultrasonic abnormality (20/136, 14.7%); increased risk at prenatal screening (12/651, 1.8%); one or two abnormal serologic markers (1/52, 1.9%); history of adverse-pregnant (1/88, 1.1%)chromosomal balance translocation carrier in either one of the couple (3/19, 15.8%); advanced maternal age (0/318). Among the 1264 cases, 5 experienced spontaneous abortion and the procedure-related fetal loss rates were 0.28% for amniocentesis (3/1082) and 1.09% for cordocentesis (2/182), P=0. 154. The rate of complications after cordocentesis was significantly higher than amniocentesis (9.89 % vs 0.18 %, P= 0.0001). Conclusions Routine fetal karyotyping should be prompted after prenatal ultrasonographic abnormalities. However, invasive prenatal diagnosis due to advanced maternal age alone is controversial. Amniocentesis is the fist choice for invasive prenatal diagnosis.