Abstract： Objective To compare the safety and clinical efficacy of recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase(UK)in catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT)for the treatment of subacute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis(DVT). Methods From June 2013 to June 2017, a total of 116 subacute DVT patients underwent consistent CDT with either rt-PA or urokinase, or simple anticoagulation treatment in this study.The patients were divided into three groups for comparison:rt-PA-CDT group(n=43), UK-CDT group(n=39)and anticoagulation group(n=34). The baseline data, thrombolysis duration, rt-PA or UK dosages, thrombolytic rate and clinical efficacy rate were compared among the three groups. Independent t-test(accorded to normal distribution)was used to analyze the thrombolysis duration.The quantitative data were analyzed with analysis of varianc and the qualitative data were compared by the chi-square test. Results There was no significant difference in general clinical features among the three groups(P>0.05). The thrombolysis duration, total dosages and thrombolytic rate (≥50)were(5.8±1.3)d,(49.7±16.1)mg,86.0% for rt-PA-CDT group,and(6.3±1.5)d,(440±99)×104 U, 66.7% for UK-CDT group.The difference of thrombolysis duration was not statistically significant between the rt-PA-CDT group and UK-CDT group(t=-1.868, P>0.05). The thrombolysis rate of rt-PA-CDT group was significantly higher than that of UK-CDT group(χ2=4.315, P<0.05). The time of obtaining grade Ⅲthrombosis rate was shorter for rt-PA-CDT group(4.7±0.9)d compared with UK-CDT group(6.0±1.2 d) (t=-2.343,P<0.05).The clinical efficacy rates of the rt-PA-CDT group[88.4%(38/43)]and UK-CDT group [76.9%(30/39)]were significantly higher than that of anticoagulation group[26.5%(9/34)](P<0.05).There was no statistical difference between the rt-PA-CDT group and UK-CDT group(χ2=1.893, P>0.05). No severe complications were found in all groups. The incidence rates of mild complication of the rt-PA-CDT group, UK-CDT group and anticoagulation group were 16.3%(7/43), 17.9%(7/39)and 8.8%(3/34), respectively, and there were no significant differences among the three groups(χ2=1.396, P>0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of CDT using rt-PA and UK for subacute DVT is better than simple anticoagulation treatment.Thrombolytic rate of rt-PA is superior to UK.