Paper - WANFANG MED ONLINE

You Position: Home > Paper

Mesh meta-analysis of the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy by different surgical methods

( views:0, downloads:0 )

Author:: No author available

Journal Title:: Chinese Journal of Pancreatology

Issue:: 1

DOI:: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115667-20200831-00140

Key Word:: 外科手术;腹腔镜;达芬奇机器人;胰十二指肠切除;网状Meta分析;Surgical procedures, operative;Laparoscopes;DaVinci robot;Pancreaticoduo-denectomy;Mesh meta analysis

Abstract： Objective:To evaluate the impact of laparotomy pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) and Da Vinci robot assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) on the risk of pancreatic fistula in postoperative patients.Methods:The key words were laparoscopic, pancreaticoduodenectomy, robot, DaVinci, Whipple, complication, fistula, pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopy, robot, postoperative complications and pancreatic fistula, and the databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and web of science were searched until August 1, 2020 for retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of OPD, LPD and RPD. The articles were screened according to the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the articles was evaluated and the data were extracted. Based on Bayesian framework, R4.0.2, Revman 5.3 and Stata 16.0 software were used to analyze the extracted data for mesh meta analysis.Results:Thirty articles involving 3 428 patients were included, including 26 retrospective cohort studies and 4 randomized controlled studies. Mesh meta-analysis showed that in the incidence of pancreatic fistula, there was no significant difference between LPD and OPD, between LPD and RPD ( OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.63-1.4; OR=1.4, 95% CI 0.87-2.2, P<0.05), but the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was significantly lower than that of OPD ( OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, P<0.05), 95% CI 1.12.1; P>0.05). The risk probability of pancreatic fistula was ranked as RPD (0.00), LPD(0.34) and OPD(0.65), that is, for the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, the advantages and disadvantages of the three surgical methods were ranked as RPD, LPD and OPD. Conclusions:Compared with OPD, RPD can significantly reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after PD and improve the quality of operation; there was no significant difference between LPD and RPD in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and both of them were safe and feasible.

Reference

[1]洪德飞.开腹、腹腔镜、达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠切除选择之我见[J].2019,(4).
[2]张俊聪,胡家平,李太原,等.达芬奇机器人手术系统与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术近期疗效的Meta分析[J].2017,(8).
[3]朱洪银,崔王平,张昕宁,等.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围癌的近期疗效对比分析[J].2020,(1).
[4].A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy:oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol[J].2014,(4).
[5]李方宽,王小明,孙卫东,等.腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术的近期临床疗效对比[J].2017,(6).
[6]曾宪涛,张超,杜亮.应用ADDIS软件实现网状Meta分析[J].2013,(12).
[7]Pedziwiatr, Michal,Malczak, Piotr,Pisarska, Magdalena,etc.Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis[J].2017,402(5).
[8]M.Gagner,A.Pomp.Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy[J].1994,8(5).
[9].Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study[J].2015,29(12).
[10]A R, Jadad,R A, Moore,D, Carroll,etc.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?[J].1996,17(1).
[11]Kim Hyeong Seok,Han Youngmin,Kang Jae Seung,etc.Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot‐assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].2018,25(2).
[12]Boggi, Ugo,Napoli, Niccolo,Costa, Francesca,etc.Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections[J].2016,40(10).
[13]涂广平,孙吉春,聂晚频,等.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺癌的效果与安全性比较[J].2020,(3).
[14]陈庆民,刘松阳,王英超,等."结肠后入路-钩突先行"在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中应用研究[J].2019,(12).
[15]Bianco FM,Addeo P,Ayloo S,etc.Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.[J].2011,35(12).
[16]McMillan, Matthew T.,Zureikat, Amer H.,Hogg, Melissa E.,etc.A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula[J].2017,152(4).
[17]Stang A.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.[J].2010,25(9).
[18]Stauffer,J.A.,Asbun,H.J..Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system[J].2012,215(6).
[19]Kauffmann, Emanuele F.,Napoli, Niccolo,Menonna, Francesca,etc.A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer based on margin status[J].2019,33(1).
[20]Croome, Kris P.,Farnell, Michael B.,Que, Florencia G.,etc.Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection: a Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Approaches[J].2015,19(1).
[21]R Yoshioka,H Yasunaga,K Hasegawa,etc.Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy.[J].2014,101(5).
[22]Cho A,Yamamoto H,Nagata M.Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease.[J].2009,198(3).
[23]Kristopher P Croome,Michael B Farnell,Florencia G Que,etc.Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?[J].2014,260(4).
[24]Ren S,Zhang X,Wang Z,etc.Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery.[J].2011,7(2).
[25]Wang, Mingjun,Cai, Yunqiang,Li, Yongbin,etc.Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-Surgeon Initial Experience.[J].2018,80(1).
[26]Baker, E. H.,Ross, S. W.,Seshadri, R.,etc.Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open approach[J].2016,12(3).
[27]Stauffer, John A.,Coppola, Alessandro,Villacreses, Diego,etc.Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution[J].2017,31(5).
[28]Pier Cristoforo, Giulianotti,Andrea, Coratti,Marta, Angelini,etc.Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.[J].2003,138.
[29]Maria,Baimas-George,Michael,Watson,Keith J,Murphy,etc.Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study.[J].2020.
[30]Varley, Patrick R.,Zenati, Mazen S.,Klobuka, Andrew,etc.Does robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy improve outcomes in patients with high risk morphometric features compared to the open approach[J].2019,21(6).
[31].Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy – A comparative study[J].2012,10(9).
[32]van Hilst, Jony,de Rooij, Thys,Bosscha, Koop,etc.Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial[J].2019,4(3).
[33]Bassi, Claudio,Marchegiani, Giovanni,Dervenis, Christos,etc.The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After[J].2017,161(3).
[34]Jiang, Jerry,Upfill-Brown, Alex,Dann, Amanda M.,etc.Association of Hospital Length of Stay and Complications With Readmission After Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].2019,154(1).
[35]Liu, Rong,Zhang, Tao,Zhao, Zhi-Ming,etc.The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center[J].2017,31(6).
[36]Erin H, Baker,Samuel W, Ross,Ramanathan, Seshadri,etc.Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.[J].2015,6.
[37]Ielpo Benedetto,Caruso Riccardo,Duran Hipolito,etc.Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison[J].2018,71(1).
[38]Poves, Ignasi,Burdio, Fernando,Morato, Olga,etc.Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial[J].2018,268(5).
[39]Kim, Song Cheol,Hwang, Dae Wook,Song, Ki Byung,etc.Matched Case-control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors[J].2015,262(1).
[40]A Yu,Popov,A G,Baryshev,A N,Lishchenko,etc.[Early outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy].[J].2018,(9).
[41]李学璐,朱丹丹(综述),杨春明,等.微创胰十二指肠切除术新进展[J].2015,(3).
[42]Palanivelu, C.,Senthilnathan, P.,Sabnis, S. C.,etc.Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours[J].2017,104(11).
[43]Yuhua,Zhang,Defei,Hong,Chengwu,Zhang,etc.Total laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.[J].2018,12(5).
[44]Bao,P.Q.,Mazirka,P.O.,Watkins,K.T..Retrospective Comparison of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Neoplasms[J].2014,18(4).
[45]Niccolò Napoli,Emanuele F. Kauffmann,Francesca Menonna,etc.Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula[J].2018,32(3).
[46]Peng, Long,Lin, Shengrong,Li, Yong,etc.Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].2017,31(8).
[47]Ng SC,Carroll JE,Smith JK,etc.Redefining mortality after pancreatic cancer resection.[J].2010,14(11).
[48]Fang,Yuan,Yasmin,Essaji,Emilie P,Belley-Cote,etc.Postoperative complications in elderly patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy lead to increased postoperative mortality and costs. A retrospective cohort study.[J].2018,60.