You Position: Home > Paper

Analysis of the outcomes after off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

( views:245, downloads:6 )
Author:
No author available
Journal Title:
CHINA MEDICINE
Issue:
11
DOI:
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2007.11.004
Key Word:
冠心病;冠状动脉搭桥术;不停跳搭桥术;体外循环

Abstract: 目的 探讨不停跳搭桥(OPCAB)与传统体外循环下搭桥(CABG)的近期及中期效果.方法 1268例行单纯搭桥手术的患者,其中传统体外循环下搭桥722例,为CABG组;不停跳搭桥546例,为OPCAB组.结果 CABG组围手术期输血量(1194±1405)ml,术后并发症73例(10.1%),死亡23例(3.2%);OPCAB组围手术期输血量(876±1486)ml,术后并发症29例(5.3%),死亡10例(1.8%),2组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05).CABG组随访441例(61%),平均随访时间(8.3±2.9)月,术后6个月CSS心绞痛分级为(1.4±0.6)级;OPCAB组随访371例(68%),平均随访时间(7.9±3.1)月,术后6个月CSS心绞痛分级为(1.6±0.8)级.2组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 OPCAB与传统CABG相比近期对机体损伤小,并发症少,病死率低,术后恢复快;中期效果OPCAB与传统CABG相比,心绞痛改善相似,死亡事件无差异,对生活质量均有改善,差异无统计学意义.

WanfangData CO.,Ltd All Rights Reserved
About WanfangData | Contact US
Healthcare Department, Fuxing Road NO.15, Haidian District Beijing, 100038 P.R.China
Tel:+86-010-58882616 Fax:+86-010-58882615 Email:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn