Effect of impaction on gene-modified cells seeded on granular bone allografts in vitro and in vivo
- Author:
- No author available
- Journal Title:
- CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
- Issue:
- 21
- DOI:
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.21.019
- Key Word:
- allograft;impaction bone grafting;bone marrow stromal cells;green fluorescent protein
Abstract： Background While attempting to restore bone stock, impaction bone grafting employed during revision joint surgery may result in slow and limited allograft incorporation into host bone. A new approach including gene-modified bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) in combination with impaction bone grafting may effectively restore bone stock and improve allograft incorporation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of impaction on gene-modified BMSCs seeded on granular bone allografts in vitro and in vivo.Methods Deep-frozen, granular, cancellous bone allografts from canines were prepared to serve as cell delivery scaffolds and were seeded with green fluorescent protein (GFP) genetically-modified BMSCs to construct cell-allograft composites. The composites were impacted in a simulative, in vitro impaction model and cultured for further analysis under standard conditions. Four Beagle dogs, treated with bilateral, uncemented proximal tibial joint hemiarthroplasty with a prosthesis, were implanted with autologous GFP gene-modified cell-allograft composites to repair the bone cavity around each prosthesis.Results A significant reduction in cell viability was observed after impaction by fluorescence microscopy in vitro.However, there remained a proportion of GFP-positive cells that were viable and functionally active, as evidenced by the secretion of GFP protein in vitro and in vivo.Conclusions Gene-modified BMSCs seeded on granular allografts were able to withstand the impaction forces and to maintain their normal functions in vitro and in vivo, in spite of a partial loss in cell viability.
- [1]M, T?gil.The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load.[J].2000,290.
- [2]Mushipe MT,Chen X,Li G,etc.Cells seeded on MBG scaffold survive impaction grafting technique: Potential application of cell-seeded biomaterials for revision arthroplasty.[J].2006,24(3).
- [3]Scott P. Bruder,Andreas A. Kurth,Marie Shea,etc.Bone regeneration by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells[J].1998,16(2).
- [4]Franzen H,Stefansdottir A,Sundberg M,etc.Five-year follow-up of socket movements and loosening after revision with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement: a radiostereometric and radiographic analysis.[J].2006,21(7).
- [5]R G, Nelissen,T W, Bauer,L R, Weidenhielm,etc.Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases.[J].1995,77.
- [6]Yu CF,Dai KR,Zhang XL,etc.Repairing of goat tibial bone defects with BMP-2 gene-modified tissue-engineered bone.[J].2005,77(1).
- [7]A W, Blom,B, Grimm,A W, Miles,etc.Subsidence in impaction grafting: the effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone.[J].2002,216(4).
- [8]MIN WANG,WEI LIU,XIAOJIE HU,etc.Repair of Experimental Alveolar Bone Defects by Tissue-Engineered Bone[J].2006,12(6).
- [9]Bruder Scott P.,Jaiswal Neelam,Ricalton Nancy S.,etc.Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteobiology and Applied Bone Regeneration[J].1998.
- [10]Ullmark G,Obrant KJ.Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation.[J].2002,17(2).
- [11]Kjeld Søballe,Ebbe S. Hansen,Helle B.-Rasmussen,etc.Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions[J].1992,10(2).
- [12]Mikhail WE,Weidenhielm LR,Mikhail N,etc.Femoral bone regeneration subsequent to impaction grafting during hip revision: histologic analysis of a human biopsy specimen.[J].1999,14(7).
- [13]Zhang WJ,Liu W,Cui L,etc.Repair of canine mandibular bone defects with bone marrow stromal cells and porous beta-tricalcium phosphate.[J].2007,28(6).
- [14]Ornstein E,Stefansdottir A,Atroshi I,etc.Quality of life after hip revision with impaction bone grafting on a par with that 4 years after primary cemented arthroplasty.[J].2004,75(6).
- [15]Stefansdottir A,Franzen H,Ornstein E,etc.Migration of the acetabular component after revision with impacted morselized allografts: a radiostereometric 2-year follow-up analysis of 21 cases.[J].1999,70(4).
- [16]Linder L.Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies.[J].2000,71(6).
- [17]Martin I,Cancedda R,Boyde A,etc.Autologous bone marrow stromal cells loaded onto porous hydroxyapatite ceramic accelerate bone repair in critical-size defects of sheep long bones.[J].2000,49(3).
- [18]English HW,Ling RS,Timperley AJ,etc.Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results.[J].2003,85(6).
- [19]Martin I,Jaquiery C,Volloch V,etc.In vitro and in vivo evaluation of differentially demineralized cancellous bone scaffolds combined with human bone marrow stromal cells for tissue engineering.[J].2005,26(16).
- [20]Wright NM,Avioli LV,Riew KD,etc.Induction of bone formation using a recombinant adenoviral vector carrying the human BMP-2 gene in a rabbit spinal fusion model.[J].1998,63(4).