Current status of coronary artery bypass surgery
- Author:
- No author available
- Journal Title:
- CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
- Issue:
- 2
- DOI:
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.02.002
- Key Word:
- No keyword available
Abstract： @@ Surgical revascularization for atherosclerotic heart disease, also called coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), was first performed in 1962, and is one of the great achievements in medicine. Relief of angina, improvement of exercise tolerance, and the realization of survival benefit have been documented.1 CABG has been used in multi-vessel disease and left main stenosis for over 40 years.2 In the last two decades the mortality of CABG has decreased to less than 2% despite an aging population with increased risk factors. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially with drug-eluting stents, has been challenging CABG, While PCI has improved, CABG has also progressed with better peri-operative management, a higher use of arterial grafting, off-pump surgery, and improved techniques with minimally invasive surgical options.3,4
- [1]Hendrick B. Barner,Mark G. Barnett.Fifteen- to twenty-one-year angiographic assessment of internal thoracic artery as a bypass conduit[J].1994,57(6).
- [2]Raich H,Vrancic M,Thierer J,etc.Total arterial off-pump coronary revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic arteries in triple-vessel disease: surgical technique and clinical outcomes.[J].2008,86(2).
- [3]Ott H,Weidinger F,Bonaros N,etc.Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues.[J].2004,127(2).
- [4]R L, Mueller,T K, Rosengart,O W, Isom.The history of surgery for ischemic heart disease.[J].1997,63(3).
- [5]Hayward PA,Gordon I,Buxton BF,etc.Which arterial conduit? Radial artery versus free right internal thoracic artery: six-year clinical results of a randomized controlled trial.[J].2007,84(2).
- [6]Mack MJ,Pfister A,Subramanian V,etc.Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.[J].2004,127(1).
- [7]Dreyfus GD,Raja SG.Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.[J].2008,16(2).
- [8]Russell ME,Pomar J,Kappetein AP,etc.Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.[J].2006,29(4).
- [9]Rexius H,Synnergren MJ,Ekroth R,etc.Incomplete revascularization reduces survival benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting: role of off-pump surgery.[J].2008,136(1).
- [10]Bucerius J,Gummert JF,Walther T,etc.Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.[J].2001,121(5).
- [11]H B, Barner,M T, Swartz,J G, Mudd,etc.Late patency of the internal mammary artery as a coronary bypass conduit.[J].1982,34(4).
- [12]A M, Calafiore,G, Vitolla,T, Iovino,etc.Left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST): mid-term results in single vessel disease.[J].1998,13(4).
- [13]Steinbruchel DA,Penninga L,Wetterslev J,etc.Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.[J].2008,29(21).
- [14]Drain A,Davies W,Rosengard BR,etc.A systematic review of randomized trials comparing revascularization rate and graft patency of off-pump and conventional coronary surgery.[J].2006,132(6).
- [15]Barner HB.Operative treatment of coronary atherosclerosis.[J].2008,85(4).
- [16]Marcheix B,Vanden Eynden F,Demers P.Influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term survival in systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.[J].2008,86(4).
- [17]A, Diegeler,T, Walther,S, Metz,etc.Comparison of MIDCAP versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life.[J].1999,2(4).