Intra-operative frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of 13 243 Chinese patients

( views:109, downloads:0 )
Author:
NIU Yun()
FU Xi-lin()
YU Yong()
Peizhong Peter Wang()
CAO Xu-chen()
Journal Title:
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Issue:
Volume 120, Issue 08, 2007
DOI:
Key Word:
breast neoplasm;frozen section;differential diagnosis

Abstract´╝Ü Background Although cytological methods for breast oncology have been used in recent decades, intra-operative frozen section has been playing a vital role in making therapeutic decisions. We analyzed a large series of frozen section diagnoses for Chinese cases of breast lesion within the last 15 years. The experience was expected to increase the diagnostic accuracy of cases with breast lesions.Methods The data from consecutive 13243 cases of breast lesions diagnosed with intra-operative frozen sections between 1988 to 2002 were compared with paraffin sections in a case by case manner. The causes of false negative and positive diagnoses as well as delayed diagnoses were analyzed.Results One hundred and seventeen cases (0.9%) were falsely diagnosed, with one false positive case and 116 false negative cases. The diagnosis of 47 cases (0.4%) was delayed. The proportion of several lesions had the features of the patients'ages. Six types (false invasion, peri-papilloma, adenoma of nipple duct, florid adenosis, sclerosing adenosis,and granulose cell tumor) of lesions may lead to false positive, and four types (morphological changes responding chemotherapy, well differentiated papillary carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, and tubular carcinoma) to a false negative. Gross and microscopic findings may be inconsistent in two types of lesions (radial scar and florid adenosis)microscopic and clinical findings in three types (ganulomatous mastitis mammary, duct ectasia, and fat necrosis), and three types (abundant fat or sclerous tissues; borderline lesions and changes of post-chemotherapy) were likely wrongly classified.Conclusions Intra-operative frozen section can accurately identify breast lesions in many instances, leading to fewer errors on account of more diagnostic experience and understanding of diagnostic limitations.

  • [1]Bianchi S,Palli D,Ciatto S,Galli M,Giorgi D,Vezzosi V,et al.Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis in a series of 672 nonpalpable breast lesions.Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103:199-205.
  • [2]Florell SR,Layfield LJ,Gerwels JW.A comparison of touch imprint cytology and Mohs frozen-section histology in the evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgical margins.J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44:660-664.
  • [3]Wen MC,Chan LP,Kwan PC,Ho WL.Frozen-section diagnosis in surgical pathology:a quality assurance study.Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1997; 13:534-539.
  • [4]Fu XL.Histopathologic biopsy and frozen section examination of the breast tumor.In:Li SL,eds.Oncology of the Breast (Chin),1st edition.Beijing:Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House; 2000:60-63.
  • [5]Hao XS,Chen KX,Liu H.Analysis of female breast cancer description epidemiology in Tianjin China.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2002; 3:143-148.
  • [6]Ng KK,Fung SY,Chow LW.Practice of breast self-examination among high risk Chinese women in Hong Kong.Chin Med J 2000; 113:1100-1103.
  • [7]Ferreiro JA,Gisvold JJ,Bostwick DG.Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of mammographically directed breast biopsies.Results of 1,490 consecutive cases.Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19:1267-1271.
  • [8]Balch GC,Mithani SK,Simpson JF,Kelley MC.Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.Am Surg 2005; 71:22-27.
  • [9]Guski H,Winzer KJ,Aldinger HU,Frohberg HD,Bick U.Possibilities and limits of diagnostic frozen section in breast carcinoma.Zentralbl Chir 1998; 123(Suppl 5):s19-s22.
  • [10]Esserman L,Weidner N.Is routine frozen section assessment feasible in the practice environment of the 1990s? Cancer J Sci Am 1997; 3:266-267.
  • [11]Challis D.Broadsheet number 41:frozen section and intra-operative diagnosis.Pathology 1997; 29:165-174.
  • [12]Avery JK.Frozen section error?-rare but disastrous.J Tenn Med Assoc 1993; 86:449.
  • [13]Sultana N,Kayani N.Validity of frozen section in the diagnosis of breast lumps:5 years experience at the Aga Khan University Hospital.J Pak Med Assoc 2005; 55:533-536.
  • [14]Barnes CA.False-negative frozen section results.Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 113:900.
  • [15]Histological typing of breast tumors.2nd ed.Geneva:World health organization,1981:15-25.
  • [16]Hufnagl P,Bayer G,Oberbamscheidt P,Wehrstedt K,Guski H,Hauptmann S,et al.Comparison of different telepathology solutions for primary frozen section diagnostic.Anal Cell Pathol 2000; 21:161-167.
  • [17]Fechner RE.Frozen section examination of breast biopsies.practice parameter.Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103:6-7.
  • [18]Caya JG,Robinson TM.Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis.Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 104:358-360.
  • [19]Cserni G.Pitfalls in frozen section interpretation:a retrospective study of palpable breast tumors.Tumori 1999;85:15-18.
  • [20]Scheiden R,Sand J,Tanous AM,Knolle U,Capesius C,Wagnon MC,et al.Accuracy of frozen section diagnoses of breast lesions after introduction of a national programme in mammographic screening.Histopathology 2001; 39:74-84.
  • [21]Interlandi A,Busacca G.Adenomas of the nipple.Minerva Chir 2002; 57:699-702.
  • [22]Bianchini GP,De Villa F,Vergine M,Pasta V,Monti M.Rare pathology of the breast:adenoma of the nipple.G Chir 2002;23:213-215.
  • [23]Azzopardi AG,Ahmed A,Milis RR.Problems in breast pathology.In:Azzopardi AG,eds.London/Philadelphia:WB Saunders; 1979:1-466.
  • [24]Adeniran A,Al-Ahmadie H,Mahoney MC,Robinson-Smith TM.Granular cell tumor of the breast:a series of 17 cases and review of the literature.Breast J 2004; 10:528-531.
  • [25]Montagnese MD,Roshong-Denk S,Zaher A,Mohamed I,Staren ED.Granular cell tumor of the breast.Am Surg 2004;70:52-54.
  • [26]Selim AG,El-Ayat G,Wells CA.Expression of c-erbB2,p53,Bcl-2,Bax,c-myc and Ki-67 in apocrine metaplasia and apocrine change within sclerosing adenosis of the breast.Virchows Arch.2002; 441:449-455.
  • [27]Harmer V.Benign breast disease.Nurs Times 2001; 97:32-33.
  • [28]Jones C,Mackay A,Grigoriadis A,Cossu A,Reis-Filho JS,Fulford L.Expression profiling of purified normal human luminal and myoepithelial breast cells:identification of novel prognostic markers for breast cancer.Cancer Res 2004; 64:3037-3045.
  • [29]Hamaoka T,Furuya Y,Yamamoto K,Kuroda Y.MCF-7 growth inhibition by ultraviolet radiation and 5-fluorouracil:the importance of treatment sequence.Cancer Lett 2000; 154:183-187.
  • [30]Xi H,Baldus SE,Warnecke-Eberz U,Brabender J,Neiss S,Metzger R,et al.High cyclooxygenase-2 expression following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is associated with minor histopathologic response and poor prognosis in esophageal cancer.Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:8341-8347.
  • [31]Pusztai L,Gianni L.Technology insight:emerging techniques to predict response to preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer.Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2004; 1:44-50.
  • [32]Volchenko NN,Medovyi VS,Slavnova EN,Savostikova MV,Medovyi VS,Sokolinskii BZ,et al.A comparative morphometric analysis of cytograms of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer.Arkh Patol 2002; 64:37-39.
  • [33]Volders W,Van Steen A.Tubular carcinoma of the breast.JBR-BTR 2001; 84:81.
  • [34]Rosen PP.Rosen's breast pathology.2nd ed.New York:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:87-94.
  • [35]Pereira EM,Maeda SA,Reis-Filho JS.Sarcomatoid variant of anaplastic large cell lymphoma mimicking a primary breast cancer:a challenging diagnosis.Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:723-726.
  • [36]Cawson JN.Can sonography be used to help differentiate between radial scars and breast cancers? Breast 2005; 14:352-359.
  • [37]Tomimaru Y,Komoike Y,Egawa C,Motomura K,Inaji H,Kataoka TR,et al.A case of phyllodes tumor of the breast with a lesion mimicking fibroadenoma.Breast Cancer 2005;12:322-326.
  • [38]Chen WH,Cheng SP,Tzen CY,Yang TL,Jeng KS,Liu CL,et al.Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast:retrospective review of 172 cases.J Surg Oncol 2005; 91:185-194.
  • [39]Sakurai T,Oura S,Tanino H,Yoshimasu T,Kokawa Y,Kinoshita T,et al.A case of granulomatous mastitis mimicking breast carcinoma.Breast Cancer 2002; 9:265-268.
  • [40]Asoglu O,Ozmen V,Karanlik H,Tunaci M,Cabioglu N,Igci A,et al.Feasibility of surgical management in patients with granulomatous mastitis.Breast J 2005; 11:108-114.
  • [41]Chaney AW,Pollack A,McNeese MD,Zagars GK,Pisters PW,Pollock RE,et al.Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast.Cancer 2000; 89:1502-1511.
WanfangData CO.,Ltd All Rights Reserved
About WanfangData | Contact US
Healthcare Department, Fuxing Road NO.15, Haidian District Beijing, 100038 P.R.China
Tel:+86-010-58882616 Fax:+86-010-58882615 Email:yiyao@wanfangdata.com.cn