Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic and open three-field subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
- Author:
- No author available
- Journal Title:
- Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Issue:
- 9
- DOI:
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2012.09.018
- Key Word:
- 食管肿瘤;食管次全切除术;胸腔镜;腹腔镜;Esophageal neoplasms;Sub-total esophagectomy;Thoracoscopy;Laparoscopy
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of thoracolaparoscopic sultotal esophagectomy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.Methods Clinical data of 98 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracolaparoscopic subtotal esophagectomy from March 2009 to October 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.One hundred and five patients were served as controls who underwent open three-field subtotal esophagectomy in the same period.Results There were significant differences between thoracolaparoscopic and open three-field subtotal esophagectomy in blood loss [(85.1±32.8) ml vs.(215.5±60.6) ml],length of stay [(12.7±3.5) d vs.(16.9±4.5) d]),pneumonia (4.1％ vs.12.4％,P＜O.05),atelectasis (3.1％ vs.10.5％,P＜0.05),pleural effusion (3.1％ vs.10.5％,P＜0.05),acute respiratory distress (1.0％ vs.7.6％,P＜0.05) and arrhvthmia (4.1％ vs.12.4％,P＜0.05).No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph node harvested,operative time,anastomotic leak,thoracic abscess,chyle chest,re-laparotony,re-thoracotomy,vocal cord paralysis,renal failure,gastric emptying,and mortality (all P＞0.05).Conclusion Thoracolaparoscopic subtotal esophagectomy is technically feasible and safe and is associated with less blood loss,less cadiopulmonary complication,and shorter hospital stay.
- [1]谭黎杰,王群,冯明祥,等.电视胸腔镜食管切除术在食管癌外科治疗中的应用[J].2008,(1).
- [2]Gothard J.Lung injury after thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation.[J].2006,19(1).
- [3]N T, Nguyen,D M, Follette,B M, Wolfe,etc.Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.[J].2000,135(8).
- [4]M M, Oken,R H, Creech,D C, Tormey,etc.Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.[J].1982,5(6).
- [5]van Lanschot JJ,de Boer AG,Fockens P,etc.Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.[J].2002,347(21).
- [6]Csendes A,Valladares H,Korn O,etc.Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival.[J].2006,20(11).
- [7]Birkmeyer JD,Finlayson EV,Welch HG,etc.Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.[J].2002,346(15).
- [8]Noshiro H,Miyazaki K,Uchiyama A,etc.Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.[J].2010,24(12).
- [9]Fushida S,Fujimura T,Kayahara M,etc.Learning of thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy: how can the learning curve be made short and flat?[J].2010,23(8).
- [10]Lang H,Tsiamis A,Karaliotas C,etc.Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.[J].2010,55(11).
- [11]James Luketich,Miguel Alvelo-Rivera,Percival Buenaventura,etc.Minimally Invasive EsophagectomyOutcomes in 222 Patients[J].2003,238(4).