You Position: Home > Paper
Hysterectomy in treatment of cervical myoma: a comparison between abdominal and vaginal routes
( views:202, downloads:0 )
- Author:
- No author available
- Journal Title:
- CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
- Issue:
- 7
- DOI:
- 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2007.07.002
- Key Word:
- 宫颈肌瘤;子宫切除术;阴道;治疗结果
Abstract： 目的 比较宫颈肌瘤全子宫切除术的经腹和经阴不同手术途径患者恢复情况,探讨两者的优缺点.方法 回顾性分析比较宫颈肌瘤患者经腹(n=30)、经阴(n=24)子宫全切术的手术时间、术中出血量、恢复肛门排气时间、术后住院天数.结果 手术时间经阴组明显少于经腹组(t=2.672,P＜0.05);术中出血量经阴组小于经腹组(t=3.214,P＜0.05);术后肠功能恢复经阴组快于经腹组(t=2.412.P＜0.05);术后住院天数经阴组明显短于经腹组(t=3.458,P＜0.05).结论 宫颈肌瘤阴式子宫切除患者住院时间明显少于经腹子宫切除组,术后并发症发生率低,是宫颈肌瘤患者子宫切除的较佳术式.
- [1]冯令达,邵敬於,朱万里.69例宫颈肌瘤的手术途径及术式研究[J].2001,(4).
- [2]张丽江,李巨,尚丽新,等.宫颈肌瘤全子宫切除术40例临床分析[J].2005,(9).
- [3]Silva Filho AL,de Magalhaes RS,Werneck RA,etc.Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction.[J].2006,274(1).
- [4]Isik Akbay EF,Harmanli OH,Panganamamula UR,etc.Hysterectomy in obese women: a comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes.[J].2004,104(4).
- [5]R, Garry,J, Fountain,J, Brown,etc.EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.[J].2004,8(26).